Category: Computers


Can a home computer teach you to fly a real plane? (AP)

Can flight simulator training on a home computer teach you enough to fly a real plane?

Sort of.

Authorities say two teenagers in Utah planned to bomb their school, steal a plane and flee the country. They’d never flown a plane, but police said they’d spent hundreds of hours with a flight simulation program.

Flight simulation software gives hobbyists a highly accurate idea of the layout of airplane cockpits and controls. Many enthusiasts attach control sticks and rudder pedals to their computers and spend hours flying to and from the programs’ simulations of actual airports, complete with portrayals of real runways and airport buildings.

The rub is that real aircraft are different from planes on the computer screen. A hobbyist used to smooth flying in the rec room can easily be thrown by the vibration, noise and wind effects in an actual light plane — not to mention the higher stakes of real flying.

It wouldn’t be impossible for a hobbyist to get a light aircraft off the ground on the first try, fly it some distance and land it. But the flight could be a rough affair and the landing hair-raising, even in good weather.

“It can be done, but it’s a bit of a long shot,” said Nels Anderson of Framingham, Mass., founder of Flightsim.com, a website for simulation enthusiasts.

Anderson also noted that “things vary from one plane to another.” The instruments and startup procedures you learn in a simulator might not match those in a plane you suddenly find yourself in.

To many enthusiasts, however, the difference in handling between a real plane and a simulation is of little importance. They are more interested in the simulators’ detailed renderings of engine, navigation and autopilot systems, particularly in simulations of large jets. Some hobbyists have created entire “virtual airlines,” with pilots flying the routes of actual passenger jets.

The most common flight simulation programs for home computers are Microsoft Flight Simulator and X-Plane, produced by Laminar Research of Columbia, S.C. Prices vary from about $50 to $80. A small industry of programmers has created “add-on” software for these programs to simulate specific planes and systems.

___

Thomas Kent flies Boeing 737 jets, often successfully, in Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Can a home computer teach you to fly a real plane?
(AP)

Utah girl credited with outing school bombing plot (AP)

SALT LAKE CITY – A 16-year-old Utah student who shared a suspicious text message with a school administrator foiled plans by two schoolmates who apparently were plotting to set off a bomb during a school assembly and run away in a stolen airplane, police said.

Roy High School sophomore Bailey Gerhardt told The Salt Lake Tribune ( http://bit.ly/wNs3xE) she received the text from a friend, one of the suspects, and told one of the administrators, which led to the arrest of the two teens. Roy is about 30 miles north of Salt Lake City.

Gerhardt said Thursday the text from the 16-year-old boy asked: “If I told you to stay home on a certain day, would you?”

That boy, whom The Associated Press isn’t naming because he’s a minor, and Dallin Morgan, 18, were pulled out of school Wednesday.

“It was the work of a very courageous student who came forward,” Roy police spokeswoman Anna Bond said Thursday. “It could have been a disaster.”

Gerhardt characterized the 16-year-old as an angry person recently dumped by his girlfriend. She said he had told her he had looked into the 1999 mass shootings at Colorado’s Columbine High School.

The juvenile later told investigators he was so “fascinated” by that massacre that he visited the Littleton, Colo., school and interviewed the principal about the shootings that killed 13 people. Roy police said the principal, Frank DeAngelis, confirmed that the boy made his visit Dec. 12.

The Roy High School plot “was months in planning,” said Roy Chief of Police Gregory Whinham, and included plans for a device designed to “cause as much harm as possible to students and faculty” at the school, which has about 1,500 students.

The FBI is examining the suspects’ computers, police said. Local and federal agents searched the school, two vehicles belonging to the suspects and their homes but found no explosives.

Morgan told police the 16-year-old suspect had previously made a pipe bomb using gun powder and rocket fuel.

“Dallin told me that (the juvenile) bragged about using a bomb to blow up a mail box and having three handguns in his house,” a police affidavit states. The 16-year-old boy “claimed that he did not have the guns but Dallin was the source of the guns because he is 18 and can purchase a gun.”

The two students prepared by logging hundreds of hours on flight simulator software on their home computers, and they planned to take a plane at Ogden Hinckley Airport after the bombing, Bond said.

Besides hinting at the plan, the juvenile also texted to a friend that both suspects wanted “revenge on the world” and “we have a plan to get away with it too.”

He hinted at the plan by writing “explosives, airport, airplane” and added, “We’re just gonna kill and fly our way to a country that won’t send us back to the US,” according to a probable cause statement police filed to make the arrests late Wednesday.

Morgan was being held on $10,000 bail at Weber County jail on suspicion of conspiracy to commit mass destruction. The juvenile was in custody at Weber Valley Detention Center on the same charge. Prosecutors were weighing possible additional charges.

Both students had “absolute knowledge of the security systems and the layout of the school,” Bond said. “They knew where the security cameras were. Their original plan was to set off explosives during an assembly. We don’t know what date they were planning to do this, but they had been planning it for months.”

School officials said there were no imminent plans to hold a school assembly.

The parents of both students “woke up in the middle of a nightmare,” Bond said. “They’ve been very cooperative.”

___

Associated Press writer Michelle Rindels in Las Vegas contributed to this report.

Utah girl credited with outing school bombing plot
(AP)

Utah teens arrested in alleged school bombing plot (AP)

ROY, Utah – Utah authorities say two Roy High School students have been arrested on conspiracy charges after authorities uncovered a plot to use explosives during a school assembly.

Eighteen-year-old Dallin Morgan was arrested Wednesday and booked into the Weber County Jail, and a 16-year-old boy also was taken into custody.

School administrators and police say they learned the students had collected maps of the school and documents about security systems. Officials say the students had a detailed escape plan that included using an airplane from the Ogden Hinckley Airport and used flight simulator software to prepare.

Local and federal agents searched the school, two vehicles and two homes, but found no explosives. The FBI is also examining computers.

School is in session Thursday.

Roy is 35 miles north of Salt Lake City.

___

Information from: Standard-Examiner, http://www.standard.net

Utah teens arrested in alleged school bombing plot
(AP)

More lawsuits filed over sex abuse of Haitian boys (AP)

NEW HAVEN, Conn. – Seventeen Haitian men are suing Fairfield University in Connecticut, the Society of Jesus and others alleging they failed to protect them from a man who sexually abused them when they were poor children or young adults attending a school he founded in Haiti.

The lawsuits bring to 21 the number of alleged victims suing Douglas Perlitz and the others. Perlitz was sentenced in 2010 to nearly 20 years in prison for sexually abusing children at Project Pierre Toussaint.

The victims ranged from ages 9 to 21 at the time of the abuse and are now 18 to 29.

The lawsuits seek $20 million for each victim. They contend Perlitz’s supervisors disregarded warning signs of inappropriate behavior with boys.

The Rev. Paul Carrier, a Jesuit priest who was Fairfield University’s chaplain, saw Perlitz show a student a pornographic video and saw boys in his bedroom, according to the lawsuits. A school board member, Hope Carter, flew to Haiti in 2008 and removed Perlitz’s computer, according to the lawsuits.

“It appears that Carter removed the computer or computers to prevent investigators, including, ultimately, federal law enforcement personnel, from discovering pornographic material, which may have included pornography relating to young boys, stored on the computer or computers,” the lawsuit states.

Carter delivered the computer to Perlitz in the United States, according to the lawsuit. Authorities later seized the computer, which Perlitz had used to access websites focusing on sexual material relating to boys.

Federal authorities say an investigation is continuing.

The lawsuits say none of the defendants took any steps to protect the children in Perlitz’s care.

“On the contrary, they facilitated Perlitz’s crimes by continuing to provide him money and facilities to run PPT in the face of evidence that Perlitz was maintaining inappropriate relationships with boys in his care,” the lawsuit states.

The Society of Jesus called the crimes “deeply disturbing” but said the school wasn’t a mission of the society, also known as the Jesuits. Telephone messages were left Thursday for the other defendants.

The defendants have sought dismissals of the first lawsuits filed last year.

Fairfield University said it did not retain or employ Perlitz and that Carrier was a volunteer officer of the Haitian school, which is separate from the university. Carrier also called himself a volunteer and argued he’s immune from liability and that there was no evidence he knew of the abuse. Carter’s attorney said there was no allegation that Carter knew of any sexual misconduct by Perlitz or that Carter “consciously assisted” Perlitz’s abuse.

The lawsuits argue that Fairfield University, which is operated by the Jesuits, raised more than $600,000 for the school and hired Perlitz in connection with the Haitian school and was negligent in its duty to supervise him. The suits say the Society of Jesus had the same responsibilities with Carrier, who served as chairman of a fund that ran the school.

Those who were abused by Perlitz told school staff, according to the lawsuit. Carrier and Carter failed to speak to the victims in a setting where they could feel safe about reporting what had happened, the suits say.

The school conducted an investigation after learning of the abuse claims in 2007 and 2008, but that probe was designed to discredit the claims and exonerate Perlitz, according to the lawsuits. Carrier and Carter prevented other school board members from questioning independent witnesses, the lawsuit alleges.

Mitchell Garabedian, an attorney for the victims, said the abuse shows rules put into place by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in 2002 were either ignored or ineffective.

More lawsuits filed over sex abuse of Haitian boys
(AP)

Charter school benefits from Huntsman focus on NH (AP)

PEMBROKE, N.H. – Students at a New Hampshire charter school got a lesson in politics Tuesday from Republican presidential hopeful Jon Huntsman.

The former Utah governor visited the Strong Foundations charter school Tuesday to distribute iPads the school recently purchased at a discount from a Utah company called iSchool Campus. The company offered 200 iPads plus computers and a new wireless network to the school in part because it wanted to capitalize on publicity generated by Huntsman’s presidential campaign. The company’s founder, Tom Pitcher, has donated $2,000 to Huntsman’s campaign, and he promoted both his company and Huntsman at the school.

The two stopped by a fifth-grade classroom where students were writing on their iPads about their Christmas gifts and using an online thesaurus to replace overused adjectives. Briefly interrupting that lesson, Pitcher asked the students to search the Internet for information about Huntsman instead.

Earlier, Pitcher told parents, students and school officials that Huntsman was a “born leader” who had helped high tech companies thrive in Utah. And he had Huntsman sign the back of an iPad he presented to a third grader and her mother, saying that “iPad Moms” could become this election cycle’s “soccer moms.”

Huntsman, who is skipping Tuesday’s Iowa caucus, is counting on a strong finish in New Hampshire’s Jan. 10 primary to keep his campaign afloat. He told students that his grandfather had been a teacher and principal who hoped his children and grandchildren would follow in his footsteps.

“You always have to have a fallback position,” said Huntsman, a former ambassador to China. “You can always go into politics.”

With all eyes on Iowa, Huntsman said he had no regrets about focusing almost exclusively on New Hampshire. He’s had the state to himself for most of the last week but that will change Wednesday when candidates start arriving from Iowa.

“We’ll obviously look at the results, and we’ll remember them for about seven hours, and then people will be focused on New Hampshire,” Huntsman told reporters.

“This will be the ballgame here, because this is a primary. This will be a broadband turnout … and it will be a result that speaks to the issue of electability.”

Huntsman had several other stops in New Hampshire before ending the day with his 150th public event in the state, a town hall meeting in Peterborough.

Charter school benefits from Huntsman focus on NH
(AP)

Spec-Ops troops study to be part-spy, part-gumshoe (AP)

FORT BRAGG, N.C. – The raid to grab Osama bin Laden inside Pakistan took just under 40 minutes — roughly 10 to get to bin Laden.

Special operators spent much of the rest of the time gathering evidence: computer files, written notes and thumb drives that pointed to new al-Qaida plots and previously secret operatives around the globe.

That science is what special operators of all types are learning at Fort Bragg’s Special Warfare Center, with real-life scenarios meant to shock — and teach.

In one exercise, a Hollywood-style explosion leaves the remains of a fake suicide bomber scattered around a checkpoint.

The students must look past the grisly mess for the evidence that could lead to those who built the bomb.

Forging lessons painfully learned in the decade since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the formal curriculum is intended to help elite military units track militants across international boundaries and work alongside sometimes competing U.S. agencies.

The coursework is similar to the CIA’s legendary spycraft training center called The Farm, and is at the brainchild of Green Beret Maj. Gen. Bennet Sacolick, a veteran of elite special operations units and a long stint on loan to the CIA.

Among the students at the CIA-approved Fort Bragg course are Army Green Berets, Navy SEALs and Marine Corps special operators. As in the Navy SEAL raid that killed bin Laden, everything from computers to fingerprints can be retrieved from a raid site and quickly analyzed. In some cases the analysis is so fast it can lead to several new targets in a single night.

The school is also an illustration of how special operations and intelligence forces have reached a less-contentious coexistence after early clashes in which CIA officers accused the military operators of ineptly trying to run their own spy rings overseas without State Department or CIA knowledge.

“As my guys go to Afghanistan and interface with CIA base and station chiefs, they can do it with more credibility than in the past,” Sacolick told The Associated Press in a rare interview.

While many in the public may not be aware that the military is allowed to gather information, and even run its own spy networks, special operations forces have been authorized to do just that since the disastrous Desert One raid meant to rescue the U.S. hostages held in Iran in 1979.

The raid went awry because of a helicopter crash, not an intelligence foul-up. But before the raid, military planners had been frustrated that CIA employees working inside the country were unable to provide the tactical intelligence needed to insert a covert force — even basic information like which way the streets ran outside the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, where the hostages were held.

That’s why almost a third of every class at the CIA’s Farm has been military, a former senior intelligence official said.

The Fort Bragg school means special operators now can get much of that CIA-style training at their home facility.

Sacolick said he was shocked at how piecemeal intelligence gathering and sharing was up until a couple of years ago. Special operations units would know their area but had no established way to pass it on, he said, or any means for reaching out to the CIA to fill in information gaps.

“The CIA will satisfy any information requirement we have,” the agency veteran said.

“All we have to do is ask the right person. So that’s what we are creating” among the special operations teams training at Fort Bragg, Sacolick said, pointing out troops who “have the vocabulary, have the contacts, know the questions to ask and who to ask.”

The CIA also helped Sacolick design the course to teach special operators the spy-related tradecraft they need for the counterterror fight outside known war zones, such as in Somalia or Southeast Asia. They learn skills like how to evade surveillance by terrorists or a target country’s intelligence service.

The elite teams’ piecemeal training in those areas, often done previously by contractors rather than at the agency’s Farm, was part of what caused the near-revolt of CIA station chiefs just after Sept. 11, when the Pentagon sent scores of such troops overseas. With their short haircuts, obvious military bearing and uneven training in tradecraft, they caused more than a few uncomfortable incidents for U.S. ambassadors and CIA chiefs, who sometimes were not even told they were there.

That led to congressional alarm and a clash between the Pentagon, the spies and the diplomats over who should be able to operate where.

The White House eventually created an information exchange to allow elite military troops to gather intelligence, while keeping State and the CIA in the loop.

To make sure spy did not stumble over spy, the Pentagon’s top intelligence official, Stephen Cambone, and the CIA’s then-top clandestine representative, Jose Rodriguez, created a mechanism that exists to this day to let each network know who was working for whom.

The next step was to find common ground among those competing tribes of intelligence and military operators — a step embraced by now-retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal. Then heading the military’s Joint Special Operations Command, McChrystal embraced the “hostage swap” of JSOC troops and CIA officers, deploying them to each other’s command centers and forcing collaboration through proximity.

But he upgraded the practice, sending his best people, instead of following the unwritten custom of sending one’s least-valuable employee to get them out of the home office.

McChrystal used to lecture his people, Sacolick among them, to forge their own networks of one-on-one relationships in other agencies to counter the enemy network.

That’s how Sacolick ended up at the CIA, and why he patterned his school on lessons the agency helped teach him.

The idea is to pass on the skills learned in the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan, where special operators have had more intelligence backup and logistical support from the regular military than they will in the remote places where they usually operate, Sacolick said.

“I need to prepare a 12-man team to go anywhere on this planet,” he said. “They need to be every bit as good as they are in Afghanistan, in the middle of Africa somewhere” or wherever the next conflict takes them.

Spec-Ops troops study to be part-spy, part-gumshoe
(AP)

Huntsman enjoys final day with NH to himself (AP)

PEMBROKE, N.H. – As he enjoyed one last day of having New Hampshire to himself, Republican presidential hopeful Jon Huntsman said his “consistent, predictable core” is just of the many things that differentiate him from front-runner Mitt Romney.

Asked by a reporter in Lebanon, N.H., to compare himself to Romney, Huntsman strung together all the criticisms he’s been sprinkling into his speeches in the last week. He started by saying simply, “I can get elected.”

“The issue is going to be trust in the 2012 election cycle. People want to know your core. They want to know you have a consistent, predictable core,” he said. “I haven’t been on three sides of all the issues. I ran a state that was No. 1 in job creation as opposed to No. 47. I’ve lived overseas four times. … The kind of experience I bring is unlike anyone else in the race.”

Huntsman, a former Utah governor and former ambassador to China, is skipping Tuesday’s Iowa caucus and counting on a strong finish in New Hampshire’s Jan. 10 primary to keep his campaign afloat. Though all eyes were on Iowa, he said he had no regrets about his decision.

“We’ll obviously look at the results, and we’ll remember them for about seven hours, and then people will be focused on New Hampshire,” Huntsman told reporters in Pembroke.

“This will be the ballgame here, because this is a primary,” he said. “This will be a broadband turnout … and it will be a result that speaks to the issue of electability.”

In Pembroke, Huntsman gave students at the Strong Foundations charter school a lesson in politics when he helped distribute iPads the school recently purchased at a discount from a Utah company called iSchool Campus. The company offered 200 iPads plus computers and a new wireless network to the school in part because it wanted to capitalize on publicity generated by Huntsman’s presidential campaign.

The company’s founder, Tom Pitcher, has donated $2,000 to Huntsman’s campaign, and he promoted both his company and Huntsman at the school.

The two stopped by a fifth-grade classroom where students were writing on their iPads about their Christmas gifts and using an online thesaurus to replace overused adjectives. Briefly interrupting that lesson, Pitcher asked the students to search the Internet for information about Huntsman instead.

Earlier, Pitcher told parents, students and school officials that Huntsman was a “born leader” who had helped high-tech companies thrive in Utah. And he had Huntsman sign the back of an iPad he presented to a third grader and her mother, saying that “iPad Moms” could become this election cycle’s “soccer moms.”

Huntsman was ending his day with his 150th public event in the state, a town hall meeting in Peterborough.

Huntsman enjoys final day with NH to himself
(AP)

Spec-Ops troops learn to be gumshoes (AP)

FORT BRAGG, N.C. – A scene of stomach-clenching gore confronted the special operations troops: The shredded remains of a suicide bomber, scattered around the checkpoint.

But the blood and body are fake, like the Hollywood-style explosion that began a classroom exercise designed to teach these students to look past the grisly mess for the evidence that could lead to those who built the bomb.

Ft. Bragg’s Special Warfare Center shows how the U.S. has turned hunting terror networks into half-science, half-art-form since the al-Qaida attacks of Sept. 11th. Forging lessons painfully learned in the decade since into a formal curriculum, the training is intended to help elite military units track militants across international boundaries and work alongside sometimes competing U.S. agencies.

The coursework is similar to the CIA’s legendary spycraft training center called The Farm, and is at the brainchild of Green Beret Maj. Gen. Bennet Sacolick, a veteran of elite special operations units, and a long stint on loan to the CIA.

Among the students at the CIA-approved Ft. Bragg course are U.S. Army Green Berets, Navy SEALs and Marine Corps special operators. As in the Navy SEAL raid that killed Osama bin Laden, everything from computers to fingerprints can be retrieved from a raid site and quickly analyzed. In some cases the analysis is so fast it can lead to several new targets in a single night.

The school is also an illustration of how special operations and intelligence forces have reached an easier coexistence, after early clashes where CIA officers accused the military operators of ineptly trying to run their own spy rings overseas without State Department or CIA knowledge.

“As my guys go to Afghanistan, and interface with CIA base and station chiefs, they can do it with more credibility than in the past,” Sacolick told The Associated Press in a rare interview.

While many in the public may not be aware that the military is allowed to gather information, and even run its own spy networks, special operations forces have been authorized to do just that since the disastrous Desert One raid meant to rescue the U.S. hostages held in Iran in 1979. The raid went awry because of a helicopter crash, not an intelligence foul-up. But before the raid, military planners had been frustrated that CIA employees working inside the country were unable to provide them the tactical intelligence needed to insert a covert force — even basic information like which way the streets ran outside the embassy.

That’s why almost a third of every class at the CIA’s Farm has been military, said a former senior intelligence official.

The Ft. Bragg school means special operators can now get much of that CIA-style training at their home facility.

Sacolick said he was shocked at how piecemeal intelligence gathering and sharing was up until a couple years ago. Special operations units would know their area, but had no established way to pass it on, he said, nor any means for reaching out to the CIA to fill in information gaps.

“The CIA will satisfy any information requirement we have,” the agency veteran said. “All we have to do is ask the right person. So that’s what we are creating,” among the special operations teams training at Ft. Bragg, Sacolick said, pointing out troops who “have the vocabulary, have the contacts, know the questions to ask, and who to ask.”

The CIA also helped Sacolick design the course to teach special operators the spy-related tradecraft they need for the counterterror fight outside known war zones, such as in Somalia or South East Asia. They learn skills like how to evade surveillance by terrorists, or a target country’s intelligence service.

The elite teams’ piecemeal training in those areas, often done previously by contractors rather than at the agency’s Farm, was part of what caused the near-revolt of CIA station chiefs just after Sept. 11, when the Pentagon sent scores of such troops overseas. With their short haircuts, obvious military bearing, and uneven training in tradecraft, they caused more than a few uncomfortable incidents for U.S. ambassadors and CIA chiefs, who were sometimes not even told they were there.

That led to congressional alarm and a clash among the Pentagon, the spies and the diplomats over who should be able to operate where.

The White House eventually created an information exchange to allow elite military troops to gather intelligence, while keeping State and the CIA in the loop.

To make sure spy did not stumble over spy, the Pentagon’s top intelligence official, Stephen Cambone, and the CIA’s then-top clandestine representative, Jose Rodriguez, created a mechanism that exists to this day, to let each network know who was working for whom.

The next step was to find some common ground among those competing tribes of intelligence and military operators — a step embraced by now-retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal. Then heading the military’s Joint Special Operations Command, McChrystal embraced the “hostage swap” of JSOC troops and CIA officers, deploying them to each other’s command centers and forcing collaboration through proximity.

But he upgraded the practice, sending his best people, instead of following the unwritten custom of sending one’s least-valuable employee to get them out of the home office.

McChrystal used to lecture his people, Sacolick among them, to forge their own networks of one-on-one relationships in other agencies to counter the enemy network.

That’s how Sacolick ended up at the CIA, and why he patterned his school on lessons the agency helped teach him.

The idea is to pass on the skills learned in the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan, where special operators have had more intelligence back-up and logistical support from the regular military than they will in the remote places where they usually operate, Sacolick said.

“I need to prepare a 12-man team to go anywhere on this planet,” he said. “They need to be every bit as good as they are in Afghanistan, in the middle of Africa somewhere,” or wherever the next conflict takes them.

Spec-Ops troops learn to be gumshoes
(AP)

Virtual schools booming as states mull warnings (AP)

DENVER – More schoolchildren than ever are taking their classes online, using technology to avoid long commutes to school, add courses they wouldn’t otherwise be able to take — and save their school districts money.

But as states pour money into virtual classrooms, with an estimated 200,000 virtual K-12 students in 40 states from Washington to Wisconsin, educators are raising questions about online learning. States are taking halting steps to increase oversight, but regulation isn’t moving nearly as fast as the virtual school boom.

The online school debate pits traditional education backers, often teachers’ unions, against lawmakers tempted by the promise of cheaper online schools and school-choice advocates who believe private companies will apply cutting-edge technology to education.

Is online education as good as face-to-face teaching?

Virtual education companies tout a 2009 research review conducted for the U.S. Department of Education that showed K-12 students did as well or better in online learning conditions as in a traditional classroom.

But critics say most studies, including many in that 2009 review, used results from students taking only some — but not all — of their courses online. They also point out wide gaps in state oversight to ensure students, and not their parents or tutors, are actually completing tests and coursework.

Still, virtual schooling at the K-12 level is booming. For example, one of the nation’s largest for-profit online education providers, Virginia-based K12 Inc., saw its earnings more than double in the first quarter of this year, fueled in large part by a 42 percent enrollment spike.

“Online learning is the future of American education. Precisely because it’s so transforming, it’s threatening to the established institutions,” said Terry Moe, a political scientist at Stanford University who studies the online school boom.

The conflict has boiled over in Colorado, which expects to spend $85 million this year educating some 14,200 students online. The state’s online school industry is growing by double digits a year, bankrolled by a state government that pays private companies to teach students as young as kindergarten entirely via computer with limited oversight.

Online schools aggressively court new students in Colorado, where they are paid the same as brick-and-mortar schools. But so far the results have been discouraging.

A 2010 report by the state Department of Education showed below-average test scores, dropout rates near 50 percent in some cases and a student-to-teacher ratio as high as 317 to 1 at one school. Still, enrollment grew more than 12 percent between 2008 and 2009, and Colorado’s online schools get paid for an entire school year even if a student drops out after Oct. 1, the date the state tallies student enrollment.

“I know there are millions of dollars being bled from the system that have no accountability tied to them,” said Democratic Senate President Brandon Shaffer, whose requested an audit of online schools but was blocked by Republicans.

“If you’re the person bringing this up, you’re labeled anti-choice, anti-reform,” Shaffer said.

An October report by the University of Colorado-based National Education Policy Center said school-choice advocates are pushing states to rush headlong into virtual K-12 education despite limited data.

“These online school providers are raking in hundreds of millions of dollars, and the product they’re putting out is just horrible,” said Gene Glass, author of the CU report and a vocal critic of public funding for online schools. But he said legislators see online schools as a cost-saver so states are moving forward.

Idaho and Florida passed laws in the last year requiring high school students to take at least one course online. Ohio lifted a moratorium on new “e-schools,” and Utah passed a “virtual voucher” law allowing high school students to choose which courses to take online and which to take at a brick-and-mortar school.

Virtual learning can fill an important void for some students.

In Mims, Fla., 14-year-old Celestial McBride was homeschooled by her mother after third grade because the family traveled frequently. Now she takes courses from the public Florida Virtual School, where she studies at her own pace and expects to have a college-level associate’s degree by the time she’s 16.

“I think you learn faster online,” said McBride, who attends virtual “clubs” including the school’s student newspaper, published online, of course.

“In a regular classroom, you could always have the kid who’s a disruption,” she said. “Online, there’s no disruption.”

McBride’s mom, Nancy McBride, said that taking classes online allows her children to travel without falling behind.

“The misconception is that the teacher isn’t there. Not true. The teacher’s right there, and they’re involved with my kids at every step,” she said

Jazmyn Styles, a 17-year-old senior at Pike High School in Indianapolis, said she takes online courses during the summer to free up time during the regular school year for college credit courses and internships.

She said she’s in regular contact with her online teacher through Skype, instant messaging and email.

“I like working at my own pace. Because when you’re in a normal classroom, the teacher can only work as quickly as the slowest student,” she said.

What about the teachers?

Kristin Kipp, a high school teacher at Colorado’s Virtual Academy in Jefferson County, said she worried about connecting with students one-on-one when she switched to an online setting, but found that she got to know her students more through their steady stream of texts, emails and phone calls.

Kipp said teachers need to be proactive to maintain regular communication with students to help them succeed.

“My constant message in an online classroom is, `I see you, I know you’re there,’” she said. “So kids are constantly getting messages from me saying, `Hey your grade went up 5 percent this week. Congratulations, keep up the hard work.’”

The nation’s largest industry group for online schools, the Washington-based International Association for K-12 Online Learning, says states would be foolish to apply the brakes to online school expansion. Group CEO Susan Patrick pointed out that about one in three college students now take some courses online, and about 50 percent of workforce training is believed to be done online.

“The world has moved online, no question,” Patrick said. “You have to ask, when did face-to-face learning become the gold standard for education?”

At the same time, the group says states need to do a better job overseeing online schools.

“You absolutely must have accountability, and in some cases, it’s not there,” Patrick said.

That’s starting to change. The Utah law that expanded students’ online school options also set new compensation rules for online schools — they get half the money up front, but the rest only for those students who finish the courses. Florida also pays only for completed courses, not by students enrolled. Oregon set up a task force to come up with better governance for virtual schools, and Washington passed a 2009 law setting up an agency within the Department of Education to vet applicants wanting to set up online schools.

Wisconsin earlier this year became the first state to require 30 hours of additional training for online teachers.

“The majority of teachers still haven’t learned to do this, and online education is a distinct skill,” said Dennis O’Connor, who teaches online education for graduate students at the University of Wisconsin-Stout.

O’Connor, who teaches his Wisconsin graduate students from his home in San Diego, embraces online learning but notes, “There’s no proof one way or the other at this point if a total online learning experience is a good thing or a bad thing,” O’Connor said.

Moe, the Stanford professor, said that states holding back on virtual education are ignoring reality.

“Twenty years from now, a typical child will be going to a hybrid school,” he said. “They’ll be going to a physical location, but computers will do 80 percent of the teaching.”

___

Follow Kristen Wyatt at http://www.twitter.com/APkristenwyatt and Ivan Moreno at http://www.twitter.com/IvanJournalist

___

Online:

National Education Policy Center online schools brief: http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/online-k-12-schooling

International Association for K-12 Online Learning: http://www.inacol.org

Virtual schools booming as states mull warnings
(AP)

Two Schools of Thought: The Key Difference Between Apple and Google (Mashable)

Apple and Google may look similar on the surface, but the companies couldn’t be any more different. That much has become clear to me after reading both the Steve Jobs biography by Walter Isaacson and Steven Levy’s In the Plex.

Google and Apple are technology behemoths that bucked the system, created game-changing products and are worth more than $550 billion collectively. Both companies have successful mobile phone divisions and web browsers, and both companies have a common enemy in Microsoft.

[More from Mashable: Google+ Brand Pages vs. Facebook Fan Pages]

The two companies are build on completely different foundations, though. Sergey Brin and Larry Page firmly believe in the power of data and numbers, and that reliance on the metrics is the cornerstone of every major decision the company makes. Information was the great leveler at Google.

Steve Jobs, on the other hand, believed in the power of design and often threw out the data. “It’s really hard to design products by focus groups,” he famously said in a 1998 BusinessWeek interview. “A lot of times, people don’t know what they want until you show it to them.”

[More from Mashable: Top 12 Quotes From the Mark Zuckerberg Interview]

There is no starker contrast of the ying-yang battle of data vs. design. It’s that conflicting yet complementary relationship that sparked one of the industry’s closest friendships and, more recently, one of technology’s fiercest rivalries.


Google: Data Is King


For some reason, I decided to read both Steve Jobs and In the Plex at the same time (the former via Kindle, the latter via audiobook). It was a surreal experience, but it made it clear to me that Google and Apple are polar opposites.

Let’s start with Google. If you need proof that data is king at Google, look no further than In the Plex. The word “data” appears in Levy’s book approximately 319 times. “Design,” on the other hand, appears fewer than 60 times.

The emphasis on design comes directly from the founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin. Here’s how Levy describes them in the beginning of the book:

“[Page and Brin] felt most comfortable in the meritocracy of academia, where brains trumped everything else. Both had an innate understanding of how the ultraconnected world that they enjoyed as computer science students was about to spread throughout society. Both shared a core belief in the primacy of data.”

The result is a company with a deliberately collegiate atmosphere, a strong meritocracy where engineers are king, and most of all a “deep respect for data.” Google is famous for making the tiniest changes to pixel locations based on the data it accrues through its tests. Google will always choose a spartan webpage that converts over a beautiful page that doesn’t have the data to back it up.

“It looks like a human was involved in choosing what went where,” Marissa Mayer once told an upset team of designers about a product design she rejected. “It looks too editorialized. Google products are machine-driven. They’re created by machines. And that is what makes us powerful. That’s what makes our products great.”


Apple: Design Is in Its DNA


Apple, on the other hand, falls on the opposite end of the spectrum. The word “design” and its variations appears in the Steve Jobs biography 432 times. The word “data” appears just 26 times in the book.

“I love it when you can bring really great design and simple capability to something that doesn’t cost much,” Jobs once told Isaacson. “It was the original vision for Apple. That’s what we tried to do with the first Mac. That’s what we did with the iPod.”

That emphasis on design derives from Jobs’s childhood experiences. Early in his life, his father taught him that it was important to craft the back of fences and cabinets properly, even though nobody would see them. Later in life, Jobs traveled through Asia and connected with the simplicity of Zen Buddhism.

Those lessons and experiences became part of his quest for perfection, a philosophy that is now essential to every product Apple ships.


Conclusion


Google has placed its faith in data, while Apple worships the power of design. This dichotomy made the two companies complementary. Apple would ship the phones and computers, while Google would provide Maps, Search, YouTube, and other web tools that made the devices more useful. But when Google decided to release its own mobile OS, their friendship quickly turned into a rivalry. And with Google poised to acquire a hardware company, that rivalry will only get stronger.

What can we learn from the battle between data and design? What can we learn from the relationship between Google and Apple?

Clearly no one school of thought is right: Apple and Google are both wildly successful and profitable companies that changed the world. Building a successful company (or living a happy life, for that matter) is not about embracing someone else’s philosophy, but staying true to your own beliefs about the world and learning from the mistakes you make along the way.

Second, design-focused companies tackle different types of problems than data-focused ones. A design-focused company like Apple (or Flipboard) will focus on creating revolutionary, never-before-seen products, because data isn’t great at predicting market revolutions. Data-focused companies like Google, however, have a better chance at revolutionizing existing markets because their products are simply better and more efficient. The search engine existed before Google, but the company used data to make the most effective one in the world. Apple, on the other hand, is credited with launching multiple revolutions, starting with personal computing.

Finally, while data and design are often opposing forces, they need each other as well. Jobs may have focused on design, but he didn’t ignore the data. When he saw the dropped call data from AT&T at the beginning of “Antennagate,” he rushed back from Hawaii to deal with it. The data provided the context on which he could design a response. Great design, even revolutionary ones, is built on solid data.

The Social Analyst is a column by Mashable Editor-at-Large Ben Parr, where he digs into social media trends and how they are affecting companies in the space.

Steve Jobs/Android image courtesy of Flickr, Jesus Belzunce

This story originally published on Mashable here.

Two Schools of Thought: The Key Difference Between Apple and Google
(Mashable)

Powered by WordPress